Indeed, you are right. I think that dismissing a text today because the writer used AI is like dismissing a mathematician or an accountant for having used a calculator, or a 20th century writer for having used a typewriter. Any intelligent person familiar with AI knows that it does not do your work for you, and if you use it well, what it does do is improve what you already do previously. That is, if you use it to do the work for you, to write for you, it will do it badly and it will be very noticeable. But if you do your research, and the text is based on your opinions and your premises, AI will greatly improve your own work and save you a lot of time. In other words, AI will be able to do work that you yourself would take several days to do in hours. The quality of the text will not depend on AI, but on you. On knowing how to ask the right questions, search and verify sources, and give the right instructions. I will never discard an article that has been reviewed by AI, among other things because I would have to discard 80% of what I read. I already take this into account, I only care that what I read has quality. And always, ALWAYS, even when AI did not exist, I look for truth, I contrast. ALWAYS. Can I trust what my president PEDRO SANCHEZ says? I trust AI more...