No, I'm giving you an example so that you understand how valid the desire of the former North American Indian to preserve his culture in his territory is, compared to, for example, the Irish immigrant in the past, as well as the exactly same feeling of the white man who lives peacefully in a poor neighborhood in Sweden and sees his neighborhood filled with conflictive Muslims. However, many hypocrites today label the latter as ultra-right or even fascist. Are you able to see the double standard? I imagine so, you seem like an intelligent person. Nowadays it is very difficult to get away from newspeak and the narrative without being labeled and, when you do, it is very easy to see that there is a lot of manipulation in the official discourses of different political sides. The big problem today is that you can no longer talk about anything because politics has invaded everything and has established narratives that do not respond to objective reality. This issue of immigration is one of the most politicized. You cannot put yourself in the middle, understanding the reasons of the immigrant but also the reasons of the native, without being labelled as far-right or red. And the truth is usually halfway between what some and others say. Are all immigrants bad? Of course not, only a minority. Were all Europeans who emigrated to America ruthless colonists who raped, killed, etc.? Well, probably not, only a minority. Did they have the right to emigrate in search of a better land since they were barely surviving in Europe? Probably yes, as long as they did not impose their ideas, their customs, etc. on others, which unfortunately they did. Do we Europeans have the right not to be invaded by Islam and to be imposed its machismo, its religion and its customs? Well, I think so. And I have never understood why I have to stop being liberal and left-wing to defend this.